Carbon Narratives for Design Planning
Sponsor: TallWood Design Institute (collaboration with University of Oregon and Oregon State University). 2020-2023
Team: Mark Fretz, PI; Alison Kwok, Co-PI with Ethan Bloom, Katherine Martin, Pallavi Chidambaranath, Joshua Rowell
The AEC industry urgently needs more clarity, specifically: impacts of biogenic carbon based on proper accounting, forestry management practices and carbon storage in the ecosystem, end-of-life material assumptions, and stand rotation timelines. This project will use peer-reviewed scientific data and invited transdisciplinary expertise and perspectives in academia, industry, government and environmental advocacy from North America and Europe to gather for five work sessions highlighting the gaps, alternative narratives, and consensus regarding mass timber embodied carbon. The University of Oregon will facilitate a common narrative appropriate for design planning and will focus on not only the Pacific Northwest region but include other regions in North America and Europe since mass timber and forest products are transacted globally for building construction. The deliverables will include a synthesis of the best available evidence/panelist information into a set of education materials with documentation on topics drawn out of the work sessions. This work will contribute to educating students, architects, engineers, builders, and developers on making informed choices regarding modern timber construction.
Design Guide
Workshop 1: Wood Certification – What is the difference and is it worth the cost?
The first of the workshop series will center conversations around North American forest certification programs. Panelists of foresters representing small, medium, and large-scaled operations, will candidly speak about forest management practices in the Pacific Northwestern United States and Canada. Their “boots on the ground” perspective will provide invaluable insight on how the AEC’s desire for wood building products impact local ecologies, economics, and overall forest sustainability. The complexities of what it means to select wood from certified forests vs non- certified forests, costs with running certified forests, and the misconceptions and understandings of what our design decisions mean when we select structural wood and wood products will be covered from forestry perspectives. There will be a Q&A period following the panelist presentations.
Workshop 2: Beyond the EPD – Economics, Equity, Ecology
The second of the workshop series will explore large scale implications of forestry practices, such as extensive or intensive harvesting, on surrounding communities, interrelated ecological networks, and global climate change. Members of the AEC industry seek clarification on how their roles and decisions in these various practices will impact the environment. The panelists represent a variety of backgrounds all unified around the questions of economics, equity, and ecology regarding the use of timber and wood building products. The facilitated conversations hope to distinguish between idealized scenarios and actual realities when it comes to advancement in forestry practices and the regulations of forested lands. There will be a Q&A period following the panelist presentations.
Workshop 3: Comparing Carbon Narratives – How do concrete, steel and mass timber actually perform?
The third workshop will address the comparative carbon analysis of three common structural materials, concrete, steel, and mass timber, and will explore the complications associated with hybrid structural systems. All three industries producing these materials advocate for the use of their material to reduce carbon in the built environment, each drawing on data and assumptions to support claims. The conversations will investigate these claims across all modules of Whole Building Life Cycle Analysis to understand the at times divergent narratives of building carbon estimation. The purpose of the panel discussion is to discuss the nuances, assumptions, and missing data points with experts studying these carbon models. There will be a Q&A period following the panelist presentations.
Workshop 4: LCA Assumptions – Carbon Neutrality vs Climate Neutrality
The fourth workshop in the series will center around lesser understood topics of Life Cycle Analysis that often provides an incomplete picture on global warming potential. There are assumptions made within LCA that do not consider regional differences or only look at a portion of the life cycle of the material leading to results that provide a short-term solution. The panelists will explain these lesser understood topics and the conversations will explore the time scales of carbon and climate neutrality. There will be a Q&A period following the panelist presentations.
Workshop 5: Design for Building End of Life – Assumptions vs Actualities
The final workshop will explore the topic of designing for a building’s end of life material flows. Frequently, only cradle to gate is considered when selecting a building material for its carbon content; however, WBLCA carbon content depends upon the longevity of a material, a building and an uncertain future. Concrete, steel and mass timber structural systems all claim recyclability and re-use potential but these are impacted by initial design considerations and market forces. The panel will consist of researchers and practitioners working to shape future material pathways through decisions made at the outset of a project and also bring together European and North American perspectives.